Many ways in
Modalities send studies over DICOM. Staff can also upload. The same workflow starts either way.
Capabilities
The capabilities behind the worklist
UrPax is the system of work around the images: who reads, in which language, by when, and what is kept afterwards.
Intake and classification
Studies arrive, the hospital is recognized, and the exam is classified before anyone touches a worklist.
The hospital is recognized
The sending facility is identified as the study arrives, so templates, language, access, and delivery follow that hospital.
Exam classification
Descriptions are matched to a catalog of more than 2,000 exam types, so the right template and the right reader are in reach.
Multi-exam studies
A study that contains more than one exam can be split into the reports it actually needs.
Worklist, coverage, and assignment
Operations see what is waiting, who is on shift, and who is allowed to read it.
Live operations worklist
Status, hospital, urgency, unread messages, and assignment sit on the same list, filtered to the role of the person looking.
Emergency studies
Urgent work is marked and held to an emergency turnaround, separate from the routine clock.
Coverage and roster
See which modalities are staffed on each shift, including overnight. Leave takes a shift back. A gap stays a gap until someone covers it.
Assignment with a reason
A study can go to a radiologist who is on shift, skilled for the exam, admitted by the hospital, and not already overloaded. Someone can still assign by hand, including an audited out-of-hours call.
Radiologist schedule
Radiologists maintain their own hours and time off. What they cover, and for whom, stays with the organization.
Reporting
A structured report, in the hospital's language, with a human signature at the end.
Templates that load themselves
The template follows the exam, the hospital, and the language. Clinical history already on the study can fill the matching section.
Every format the hospital needs
Submitting a report stores PDF, Word, HTML, and the plain text used for hospital-system delivery.
Eleven report languages
The hospital's language and the language the report was written in are kept apart, so a report that still needs translation is visible.
Checked against the template
Required sections and unsafe gaps can be caught while the report is written, and again before it is signed.
AI preliminary draft
Where a hospital turns it on, AI can prepare a preliminary report. It enters the human chain. AI does not sign the study off.
AI-assisted review
A first review can look for missing findings, laterality, and whether the impression matches the body. A person still decides.
Translation, original kept
Prose can be translated into the hospital's language before delivery. The doctor's original is archived and can be compared.
Independent reporting flows
One study can carry more than one full report — a second read with its own writer, reviewers, and QA, not a comment on the first.
Diagnostic viewers
Readers open the images in a diagnostic viewer beside the report, including prior studies for comparison.
Quality, time, and accountability
The hospital's deadline and the radiologist's own commitments are measured separately, and both leave a record.
Conversation on the study
Hospital, operations, and the reader share one thread on the study, with unread work visible on the list.
Was the report useful?
The hospital can rate the report it received. That score stays separate from the quality desk's judgment of whether the read was correct.
Accuracy review
Quality review sits inside the report, against the findings. A return, an amendment, or a late finding can carry the same kind of record.
Subspecialty ratings
Each radiologist can carry a rating in each subspecialty. Below the line, they can be held back from work they should not read.
Two clocks
Hospital turnaround is reception to delivery. A radiologist is measured on the time the study was in their hands, including how quickly they acknowledge it.
Scorecards
On-time work, hospital ratings, and the radiology company's own assessment stay separate, each with its denominator.
An audit trail
Assignments, report actions, and delivery are written down per study, so a question later has an answer.
Delivery and archive
The finished report reaches the hospital, and the study stays readable under retention rules.
Hospital-system delivery
Final reports can be sent into the hospital information system, with status and a visible retry when a send does not land.
People are told
The right role is notified when a report is ready for review, returned, or ready for the hospital.
Versions
Submissions, QA, amendments, and the pre-translation original stay in the report history and can be compared.
Read-only archive
Completed studies move to a controlled archive. Retention is enforced, and the archive does not accept ordinary edits.
Each organization, each role
A hospital sees its studies. A radiologist sees the work they hold. Operations runs the queue.
Roles with different jobs
Administrators, supervisors, operators, radiologists, quality reviewers, and hospital users do not share one screen or one set of actions.
Many hospitals, one workflow
Each hospital keeps its templates, language, turnaround, and who may read for it. A network can set the shared defaults.
Radiology companies
A radiology company can run its own hospitals, readers, and terms on the same platform, without mixing another company's studies into the work.